Photo coutesy of Mark Sabaj-Pérez. Contact Eurekalert.org for permission of use.MEGAPIRANHA PARANENSIS, A NEW GENUS AND SPECIES OF SERRASALMIDAE

(CHARACIFORMES, TELEOSTEI) FROM THE UPPER MIOCENE OF ARGENTINA

ALBERTO LUIS CIONE,1 WASILA M. DAHDUL,*,2 JOHN G. LUNDBERG,2 and ANTONIO MACHADO-ALLISON3

1Division Paleontologıa de Vertebrados, Museo de La Plata, 1900 La Plata, Argentina, acione@museo.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar;

2The Academy of Natural Sciences, Department of Ichthyology, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

19103, U.S.A., wasila.dahdul@usd.edu or lundberg@acnatsci.org

3Instituto de Zoologia Tropical, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Apartado de Correos 47058, Caracas, 1041-A, Venezuela,

amachado@strix.ciens.ucv.ve

Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29(2):350–358, June 2009 @2009 by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology

ABSTRACT—Megapiranha paranensis from the Upper Miocene of Argentina is described based on a large, partially

toothed premaxilla as a new genus and species of serrasalmid fish (pacus and piranhas) and is diagnosed and distinguished

from other serrasalmids based on the following unique combination of characters: seven premaxillary teeth with the first

four arranged in a shallow, zig-zag row, and third tooth shaped similarly to the fourth and fifth teeth; large, triangular,

unicuspid crowns with finely serrated cutting edges. The phylogenetic position of Megapiranha was determined by

parsimony analysis of morphological characters. The resulting analysis recovered Megapiranha as sister to the piranha

clade (Pygopristis, Pygocentrus, Pristobrycon, Serrasalmus) and is supported by two synapomorphies: (1) teeth triangular

in labial view with well-developed cutting edges, and (2) serrations along both sides of tooth cutting edges. The pattern of

tooth placement exhibited by the fossil Megapiranha is intermediate between the double-row condition of pacus and the

single-row condition of piranhas, and suggests how the double row of teeth may have been rearranged into a single row in

the evolution of piranhas.

INTRODUCTIONmailto:wasila.dahdul@usd.edu

Frank Magallanes

I remember hearing rumors of a 3 foot long piranha swmming the river of Argentina for a number of years. At the time I thought my fellow hobbyist had a bit of  too much Canadian beer. Such a beast would have been not only impressive but largely sought after by piranha collectors. Of course, only species under 20 inches have been the norm for fisherman, unless of course you catch the vegetarian pacu. A close relative of the piranha. But now science has discovered the fossil of a huge beastly piranha along the Paraná River and named it Megapiranha paranensis. Unfortunately, only the premaxllae and teeth were found and not the rest of the body. The teeth are serrated and short, like those of a pacu, yet placed in a zigzag pattern on the upper  jaw.  (Cione et al., 2009). The fossil record of piranhas is presently limited to a few isolated teeth of Neogene age (Lundberg, 1998). This fossil is described as a new genus and species of Serrasalmidae (Cione et al., 2009).

The species Megapiranha paranensis was compared with the tooth structure and jaws of Colossoma macropomum  and Serrasalmus rhombeus. Scientists were only able to code Megapiranha for a small portion of morphological  characters. Several plesiomorphic  characters are present in Megapiranha. The fossil has seven premaxilary  teeth, similar to all serrasalmid genera except Catoprion mento (5 teeth) and six teeth in piranhas (of which the last is a compound tooth (Machado-Allison, 1982). The species has attachment scars of the distal most teeth and are subcircular similar to most serrasalmids and not labiolingually  compressed as in the derived condition seen in piranhas (Cione et al., 2009).

Megapiranha, because of its similar premaxilary characters support the placement with its sisters of the piranha clade (Pygocentrus, Serrasalmus, Pristobrycon, and Pygopristis).  The difference between Megapiranha and modern piranhas; is today piranhas have a large central cusp flanked by at least one small cusp (except P. denticulata which has penticuspid teeth,  (Machado-Allison, 1982).

From the evidence, it becomes clear that Megapiranha evolved independently  from other Serrasalmids. Megapiranha represents the first record of an extinct Serrasalmid (Cione et al., 2009). The teeth of this fish were probably used to feed on plant matter, much like hte pacus of  today. But experts are divided and remains unknown what the ecology was like during the live period of this creature. Piranhas, which were thought to be strictly carnivorous at one time, are now known to also indulge in plant eating as well. Some piranhas (pirambeba) have specialized teeth for shearing off seed husks (P. denticulata), other piranhas eat scales and fins (Nico 1991). This suggests that the extremely compressed  tooth morphology seen in piranhas did not evolve in correlation with carnivory (Cione et al., 2009) . In light of this plasticity, the compressed crowns and round tooth bases of Megapiranha specimens may have been  suited to a range of feeding behaviors (Cione et al., 2009).

Additionally,  catalog problems continue with proper locality data on fossils. This makes it difficult to ascertain where specifically  the fossils are collected .  Fortunately, the Paraná collection offer a generalized area of collection. This will enable field research workers to apply more specific collection data to future fossils.

For now, readers can access eurekalert.org web site to see actual photos of fossil, by CLICKING HERE.

There is still so much out there that has yet to be discovered on piranhas. This is one giant step to understanding them further.

 

Frank Magallanes, OPEFE

July 3, 2009

 

REFERENCES:

.PDF is not available at this web site for public viewing. Please refer to the above authors for copies.

LITERATURE CITED

  • Acenolaza, F. G. 1976. Consideraciones bioestratigra´ ficas sobre el Terciario marino de Parana´ y alrededores. Acta Geologica Lilloana13:91–107.

  • Acenolaza, F. G. 2000. La Formacion Parana´ (Mioceno medio): estratigrafa, distribucion regional y unidades equivalentes. Serie de Correlacion Geologica 14:9–28.

  • Acenolaza, F. G., and G. Acenolaza. 1999. Trazas fosiles del Terciario marino de Entre Rıos (Formacion Parana´ , Mioceno medio), Republica Argentina. Boletın de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias, Cordoba 64:209–233.

  • Agassiz, L. 1844. Report on the fossil fishes of the London clay. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science 13: 279–310.

  • Ameghino, F. 1906. Les Formations Sedimentaires du Cretace Superieur et du Tertiaire de Patagonie avec un parallele entre leurs faunes mammalogiques et celles de l’ancien continent. Anales del Museo Nacional de Buenos Aires 15 (ser. 3a, 8):1–568.

  • Chebli, G. A., O. Tofalo, and G. Turzzini. 1989. Mesopotamia; pp. 79–100 in G.A. Chebli and L. Spalletti (eds.), Cuencas Sedimentarias Argentinas. San Miguel de Tucuman, Universidad Nacional deTucuman, Instituto de Correlacion Geologica, Serie Correlacion Geologica, 6:Tucuman.

  • Cione, A. L., and E. P. Tonni. 1995. Chronostratigraphy and “Land-mammal ages” in the Cenozoic of southern South America: principles, practices, and the “Uquian” problem. Journal of Paleontology 69:135–159.

  • Cione, A. L., and E. P. Tonni. 1996. Reassesment of the Pliocene-Pleistocene continental time scale of southern South America. Correlation of the Chapadmalalan with Bolivian sections. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 9:221–236.

  • Cione, A. L., and E. P. Tonni. 2001. Correlation of Pliocene to Holocene southern South American and European mammal-bearing units.Bolettino della Societa´ Paleontologica Italiana 40:167–174.

  • Cione, A. L., M. M. Azpelicueta, M. Bond, A. A. Carlini, J. R. Casciotta, M. A. Cozzuol, M. de la Fuente, Z. Gasparini, F. J. Goin, J. Noriega, G. J. Scillato-Yane´ , L. Soibelzon, E. P. Tonni, D. Verzi, and M. G. Vucetich. 2000. Miocene vertebrates from Entre Rıos province, eastern Argentina; pp. 191–237 in F. G. Acen˜ olaza and R. Herbst (eds.), El Neogeno de Argentina. INSUGEO Serie Correlacio n Geologica, 14:Tucuman.

  • Cione, A. L., E. P. Tonni, and J. San Cristobal. 2002. A Middle-Pleistocene marine transgression in central-eastern Argentina. Current Research in the Pleistocene 19:16–18.

  • Cione, A. L., J. R. Casciotta, M. M. Azpelicueta, M. J. Barla, and M. A. Cozzuol. 2005. Peces marinos y continentales del Mioceno del area mesopotamica Argentina, procedencia estratigr fica y relaciones biogeogroficas. Miscelanea INSUGEO 12:49–64.

  • Cordini, R. 1949. Contribucion al conocimiento de la geologıa economicae Entre Rıos. Anales de la Direccion General de Industrias y Minerıa 2:1–45.

  • Cozzuol, M. A. 1993. Mamıferos acuaticos del Mioceno medio y tardıo de Argentina. Sistematica, evolucion y biogeografıa. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo de La Plata, Argentina.

  • Dahdul, W. M. 2004. Fossil serrasalmid fishes (Teleostei: Characiformes) from the Upper Miocene of north-western Venezuela; pp. 23–28 in M. Sanchez-Villagra and J. Clack (eds.), Palaeontology of the Castillo Formation in North-western Venezuela. Special Papers in Palaeontology 71.

  • Dahdul, W. M. 2007. Phylogenetics and diversification of the Neotropical Serrasalminae (Ostariophysi: Characiformes). Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,107 pp. del Rı´o, C. J. 1991. Revisio´ n Sistema´ tica de los Bivalvos de Ia Formacion Parana´ (Mioceno medio). Provincia de Entre Rıos-Argentina. Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales, Monografıa, 7, 93 pp.

  • Doering, A. 1882. Informe oficial de la Comisio´n cientı´fica agregada al Estado Mayor General de la expedicio´n al Rio Negro. Geologıa.Buenos Aires 299-530.

  • D’Orbigny, A. 1842. Voyage dans l’Amerique meridionale. P. Bertrand, Paris, 188 pp.

  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791.

  • Fink, S. V., and W. L. Fink. 1981. Interrelationships of the ostariophysan fishes (Teleostei). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 72:297–353.

  • Frenguelli, J. 1920. Contribucion al conocimiento de la geologıa de Entre Rıos. Boletı´n de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Cordoba (Republica Argentina) 24:55–256.

  • Gayet, M., and F. Meunier. 1998. Maastrichtian to early late Paleocene freshwater Osteichthyes of Bolivia: additions and comments; pp.85–11 in Z. M. Lucena, R. E. Reis, R. P. Vari, and C. A. Lucena (eds.), Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre.

  • Gosline, W. 1951. Notes on the Characid fishes of the subfamily Serrasalminae. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 27:17–64.

  • Gunther, A. 1864. Catalogue of Fishes in the British Museum. London, 5: –xii+ 1–455.

  • Iriondo, M. H. 1980. El Cuaternario de Entre Rı´os. Revista de la Asociacion de Ciencias Naturales del Litoral 11:125–141.

  • Jegu, M. 1989. Une nouvelle espece du genre Mylesinus (Pisces, Serrasalmidae), M. paraschomburgkii, decrite des bassins du Trombetas et du Uatuma˜ (Bre´ sil, Amazonie). Revue d’Hydrobiologie Tropicale 22:49–62.

  • Jegu, M. 2003. Subfamily Serrasalminae (pacus and piranhas); pp.182–196 in R. E. Reis, C. J. J. Ferraris, and S. O. Kullander (eds.), CLOFFSCA, Check List of Freshwater Fishes from South and Central America. EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre.

  • Jegu, M. 2004. Taxinomie des Serrasalminae phytophages et phylogenie des Serrasalminae (Teleostei: Characiformes: Characidae). PhD thesis Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 423 pp.

  • Lundberg, J. G. 1997. Fishes of the Miocene La Venta Fauna: additional taxa and their paleobiotic implications; pp. 67–91 in R. F. Kay,

  • R. H. Madden, R. L. Cifelli, and J. J. Flynn (eds.), Vertebrate Paleontology in the Neotropics: The Miocene Fauna of La Venta, Colombia. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

  • Lundberg, J. G. 1998. The temporal context for the diversification of neotropical fishes, pp. 49–68 in Z. Lucena, R. Reis, R. Vari, and C. Lucena (eds.), Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre.

  • Lundberg, J. G., A. Machado-Allison, and R. F. Kay. 1986. Miocene characid fishes from Colombia: evolutionary stasis and extirpation. Science 234:208–209.

  • Machado-Allison, A. 1982. Studies on the systematics of the subfamily Serrasalminae (Pisces-Characidae). PhD thesis The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., 267 pp.

  • Machado-Allison, A. 1983a. Estudios sobre la subfamilia Serrasalminae (Teleostei, Characidae). Parte I. Estudio comparado de los juveniles de las “Cachamas” de Venezuela (Generos Colossoma y Piaractus). Acta Biologica Venezuelica 11:1–101.

  • Machado-Allison, A. 1983b. Estudios sobre la sistematica de la subfamilia Serrasalminae (Teleostei, Characidae). Parte II. Discusio´n sobre a condicio´n monofile´ tica de la subfamilia. Acta Biolo´ gica Venezuelica 11:145–195.

  • Marshall, L., R. Hoffstetter, and R. Pascual. 1983. Mammals and stratigraphy: geochronology of the continental mammal-bearing Tertiary of South America. Palaeovertebrata Me´moire Extraordinaire1–93.

  • Nico, L. G. 1991. Trophic ecology of piranhas (Characidae: Serrasalminae) from savanna and forest regions in the Orinoco river basin of Venezuela. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Florida,210 pp.

  • Ortı´, G., P. Petry, J. I. R. Porto, M. Je´gu, and A. Meyer. 1996. Patterns of nucleotide change in mitochondrial ribosomal RNA genes and the phylogeny of piranhas. Journal of Molecular Evolution 42:169–182.

  • Pascual, R., and O. Odreman Rivas. 1971. Evolucion de las comunidades de los vertebrados del Terciario argentino. Los aspectos paleozoogeograficos y paleoclimaticos relacionados. Ameghiniana 8:372–412.

  • Reig, O. A. 1957. Sobre la posicion sistematica de Zygolestes paranensis Amegh. y de Zygolestes entrerrianus Amegh. con una reconsideracion de la edad y correlacion del “Mesopotamiense.” Holmbergia 5:209–226.

  • Ringuelet, R. A., R. H. Aramburu, and A.A.d. Aramburu. 1967. Los peces argentinos de agua dulce. Comisio´n de Investigaciones Cientıficas, La Plata, 602 pp.

  • Roberts, T. R. 1975. Characoid fish teeth from Miocene deposits in the Cuenca Basin, Ecuador. Journal of Zoology 175:259–271.

  • Rubilar, A. 1994. Diversidad ictiologica en depositos continentales miocenos de la Formacion Cura-Mallin, Chile (37–39 S): implicancias paleogeograficas. Revista Geologica de Chile 21:3–29.

  • Scartascini, G. 1954. El lı´mite Plio-Pleistoceno de la Provincia de Entre Rıos. Revista del Museo Municipal de Ciencias Naturales de Mar del Plata 1:55–77.

  • Shellis, R. P., and B. K. Berkovitz. 1976. Observations on dental anatomy of piranhas (Characidae) with special reference to tooth structure. Journal of Zoology 180:69–84.

  • Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP* 4.0b10. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.

  • Uliana, M. A., and K. T. Biddle. 1988. Mesozoic-Cenozoic paleogeographic and geodynamic evolution of southern South America. Revista Brasileira de Geociencias 18:172–190.

  • Zanata, A. M., and R. P. Vari. 2005. The family Alestidae (Ostariophysi, Characiformes): a phylogenetic analysis of a trans-Atlantic clade. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 145:1–144.

 USE YOUR BACKSPACE OR CLICK HERE TO RETURN RESEARCH PAGE

TO RETURN HOME CLICK HERE.

Copyright© 1994-2009 Oregon Piranha Exotic Fish Exhibit (The OPEFE fish exhibit is permanently CLOSED as of 2000) Sutherlin, Oregon. Information posted on this web site is archival data on fish scientific classifications and other information.

 

DISCLAIMER: The copyrighted material may not be used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship or research. Cited information requires credit and this link www.opefe.com. All rights reserved. All images shown  (unless otherwise noted) is property of OPEFE.

UPDATED: 07/09/2009